About Me

Name: Zentrist
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

On Thomas Friedman and Allan Greenspan

First, I have a confession to make:  I've never been very interested in "the environment" except as a factor in the philosophy of man.  (Freedom and Determinism--that perennial conundrum.)  In spring of 1970, a good friend tried his best to get me to help him organize the local Earth Day.  I said, not only no, but hell no.  The thirty-ninth anniversary of that original Earth Day was celebrated just a couple weeks ago on El Rushbo's radio show.  Rush taught me a few things I didn't know.  The founder of Earth Day wound up killing his wife and being defended in court by Arlen Specter.  But today, that is neither here nor there.
 
Since 1986 I've been driving a four-cylinder Toyota pick-up; until recently I've been "recycling" zilch; I continue to eat meat, tonight at Arby's; we use window units to save on electricity, but I've refused the offers from Green Mountain Electric; also in 1986 I quit drinking alcohol and have stayed sober (for the most part) ever since--wait a minute:  What does THAT have to do with our topic?
 
What is our topic?
 
Thomas Friedman's recent article which appeared this morning in the newspaper.  "Obama's green team is superb--now he just has to lead the way."  The paper provided that title.  Friedman provides a speech that he thinks Obama ought to give:
 
"My fellow Americans, I want to speak to you about a new economic law.  You've heard of Moore's Law in information  technology.  I'd like to speak to you about the 'Law of More' in energy technology.  Americans, Indians, Chinese, Africans, we all want more--more comfort in our homes, more mobility in our lives, more technologies with which to innovate.  But there is only one way all 6.3 billion of us can have more and not make this an unlivable planet, and that is by living our lives and running our businesses in more sustainable ways and properly accounting for it.
 
"Right now, we're paying a huge price--a tax--for everyone trying to achieve more in an unsustainable way.  But the 'More Tax' is not imposed by the U. S. government.  It is a tax imposed by the market and will continue rising indefinitely as more and more people want more and more stuff.  It will steadily drive up gasoline prices, home heating prices and factory electricity prices.
 
"My proposal is that today we fix a durable price on carbon-based fossil fuels, but set it to begin only in 2011, after we're out of this recession.  Every home builder, air-conditioning manufacturer, gasoline refiner, car maker will know that it's coming and will, I believe, immediately look for ways to profit from and invest in more energy-efficient systems.  Yes, the cost of gasoline or kilowatt-hours will rise in the short term.  But in the long term, your actual bills and expenses will go down because your car, applicances and factory will become steadily more productive. 
 
"So those are our choices--an escalating 'More Tax' forever or a 'Carbon Tax Cut' forever, which is what you'll get from establishing a carbon price signal that shapes the market in favor of American interests and not those of our adversaries and competitors.  If you're with me, write your member of Congress and senator today."
 
Now, for your convenience, if you write the old-fashioned way, here is the address of your representative and senator:
     Hon. Congressman ___________
     The U. S. Congress
     Washington, D. C.  20515
 
     Hon. Senator _____________
     The U. S. Senate
     Washington, D.C.  20510
 
As for Allan Greenspan, he's green, too.  A New York Times columnist you might not necessarily trust.  But an Allan Greenspan--Let's put it this way.  After watching the interview of Greenspan that came with the publication of one of his recent books, perhaps his recentmost book, I was convinced that Al Gore is right and Sean Hannity is wrong on the Green Movement.  This hack, me, is now officially green.  Why?  both Thomas Friedman and Allan Greenspan, not to mention the Pope and the bulk of trustworthy data...data means A LOT to Dr. Greenspan...but don't take my word or anyone else's:  Find out for yourself!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

From Newton, Iowa to Fox High School

The symbolism here is irresistible.  By "chance," President Obama landed about a week ago in Newton, a great town I'm sure but an even greater symbol--of the Age of Obama--for this new age is about progress or change, innovation and "making things," science and technology.  What better symbol for each of these ideas than Isaac Newton, the inventor (along with others) of "classical" physics?  In this sense, the Obama Team knew what it was doing right down to the little detail of the name of the town to visit. 
 
 Newton, ironicallly a very Godly and religious man, stands for Modernity and Enlightenment.   His "modern ideas" have unfolded before our historical eyes in the pages of a history of "growth" and "progress" culminating in the disaster of World War I.  At which point, survivors began to question the value of such a "march" of "history" and "progress."  Indeed as a scientific civilization we've continued to perform deeds of technological innovation, for example, "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind."  This idea of progress and innovation will not go away.  Truth be told, I'm personally grateful to Newton and Company for modern, pain-free medicine and dentistry.  The impact that "Newton's Ideas" have had on our President is obvious.  Obama has referred to the "nation that put a man on the moon," its potential for even greater achievement.  Indeed.  No Descartes (calculus), no Leibniz (math of  oval orbits), no Newton (mathematical physics)--NO MOON MISSION.   Now, to jump ahead some twenty years from now, we hope with Obama that we can look back and say of our time, "That was when we began to get serious about education, energy and health care."  Again, I'm with the President, but I'm worried about the "FOX" part of the equation.  Why did Obama et. al. choose a school whose name is "Fox"?  I'm not being cute here.  I think even the names of places chosen to visit are chosen with care.  These names are great material, at any rate, for writers--or should I say fools?--like me.
 
Very briefly:  To me, Fox High School clearly points up at least the unconscious way in which (FOX)  people like Sean Hannity and Charles Krauthammer and Bill O'Reilly are being "dialogued" with.  There is this dialogue going on between Obama, who takes it all in, and his more visible adversaries.  And the President has been and continues to be proactive about it.  He will "speak to" the issues--whatever they might happen to be.  In fact, so determined is this POTUS not to sweep anything under the rug--he will even "as it turns out" visit a public high school called Fox High School.  I don't think Obama is trying to be cute.  I think he is planting seeds, so to speak.  When you recognize someone, acknowledge their existence, even shake their hands--you honor him or her.  To look at people that way is to look out for them, to be concerned about their authentic well being. 
 
President Obama is a great coach.  I happened to see recently Charlie Rose's interview with "Coach K" of Duke.  Coach K teaches his players, his staff, his family and anyone listening.  He sees the potential, the "gold standard" inside.  He has a knack for e-ducating, for "drawing out" that incredible potential. 
 
It occurs to me that Obama is also good at educating people.  I compliment him; as an educator I compliment President Obama for the nice compliment he gave to the sharp fourth-grader who turned up somehow at Fox High School.  He complimented her for the "poise" with which she "articulated" an "excellent" question. 
 
Finally, about that FOX symbol.  After World War I, conservatives and liberals alike began to wonder:  We've made so much Progress in technology...what with the sophisticated weapons and even "flying machines."  Our thinkers have begun to imagine a new kind of politics, one based on this amazing scientific model.  But now this technology married to our "morals" has exploded in our face.
 
So much for History married to Technology.  So much for the "enlightenment."  Millions and millions dead and mutilated.
 
The challenge that Fox News and its more or less disenchanted philosophy, its "conservativism,"  bring to Obama, is:  How can we prevent yet another historical catastrophe? 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Joy to the World

After hearing the good news of Senator Specter's conversion, I found myself silently singing, "Joy to the World," by Three Dog Night:  "Joy to the world...all the boys and girls...Joy to the fishes in the deep blue sea--Joy to you and me!"
 
I think maybe this Audacity of Hope Thing is really catching on, and the louder OReilly/Hannity get, the more joyful the outcomes--for centrists like me.  Talk about obnoxious.  OReilly can be insufferable!  O well, you can't argue with his ratings.  But you can argue with his opinions and those of people who share them, for example the idea that we all ought to be flag-waving patriots no matter what our governement is doing.  If you did not like what the Bush-Cheney regime was doing, you had a right not to wave your flag.  If you feel violated almost by what the Obama Adm is doing, you have a right not to display openly your "patriotism."  I am grateful to Townhall.com for the forum, the opportunity, on occasion, to speak my mind. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dear President Obama

Dear President Obama:  Have you read Charles Krauthammer's article this morning?  I read it with my coffee.  I continue to support you, but I wonder how long what Fred Barnes has called your "misdirection" is going to hold up.  Last night on O'Reilly, you got a really great endorsement from none other than the Ubermensch Himself, Donald Trump.  Trump is growing on me.  His endorsement or moral support, if you will, matters--and not just to me.
 
But Krauthammer's article, incisive as usual, really peels off the various and sundry layers of "spin."  Sooner or later, you, the POTUS, will have to really level with us.  Actually, you already have levelled with those of us who are really listening, like me.  You've said, "If this was gonna be easy, we'd already have done it."  All of us, rich and poor alike, are going to have to make sacrifices.  No other president in our history has ever spoken to us as you are speaking to us now.  Maybe it's because, only a few short years ago, you were still driving your own car and not being chauffered around.  Only a few months ago, really, you were still doing the dishes with that DAWN detergent I saw in a photo.  At any rate, the way you speak shows you've not been in some hermetically sealed bubble of self-protection.  You've been as the philosopher says, a "being-in-the-world."
 
As such, as you admit, you watch the cable TV "once in a while."  And you read articles like Krauthammer's.  All I can say is, keep levelling with us; keep doing what you're doing (while taking a break every now and then); and if the "numbers" really don't add up, as Charles claims, and they probably don't--because he is honest...then go ahead and address that issue, too. 
 
As a poor person, for my part, I'm willing to pitch in in any way I possibly can.  For one thing, I'm bound and determined to improve my diet, reducing fats and sugars, so that I won't need that much health care in the first place!  Also, when the end does come for me, I'd hope that our system is such that "death with dignity" is available, and some autonomy is available to the dying man or woman.  I"m talking about the very end. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On Torture: Athens, Jerusalem, Rome and NYC

The biblical side of the American character would seem to be without question against torture--I mean, cruel, bloody, barbaric torture of the kind that is associated with names like Attila the Hun or Machiavelli.  The Shining City on A Hill, as Shepard Smith said yesterday so passionately, DOES NOT TORTURE.  He slammed his fist on the table and used the f word.   
 
But the Machiavellians or neocons, led by Bill Kristol and Charles Krauthammer, early on gave a defense of torture in their magazine, The Weekly Standard.  Krauthammer's article appeared in or around the year, 2003.  Krauthammer was not defending excruciating, bloody torture in the sense of say, pulling out the fingernails.  Or cutting off a finger.  But if American lives could be saved, waterboarding at worst and other techniques as well--could be justified.  I recall that we used loud music against Noriega, when he was hiding from us. Sorry, this was not really torture.  (And, it was a very different situation.)
 
At any rate, the Athenian side of our national psyche, the inner-Thucydides or Alcibiades--would certainly make the case for some kind of torture in certain very extreme circumstances.  Actually, our Puritan ancestors, unless I'm wrong, countenanced torture and used it.  I'm thinking of their horrible death penalties.  One also recalls what I'll call... The Confinement. 
 
As for the Roman influence on our country, by that I mean its legacy of laws, deliberation, reason and debate, prudence and traditions.  The Roman citizen, at least, enjoyed certain "human rights."  Of course, the slaves did not.  In our case, the Islamists--would not.  In fact, whether shameful or not--they did not "enjoy" human rights.  From now on, however, new laws will be in play and will, we hear, be enforced. 
 
The NYC in the title is synechdoche for Contemporary America.  But in my opinion Fox News' Shepard Smith was not necessarily voicing the opinion of the majority of Americans--especially in our frame of mind after 9/11.
 
I must say, this whole debate has got me thinking or re-thinking the issue.  Apparently, President Obama, too, has been re-thinking the issue in terms of how to approach it.  On the one hand, he wants to have his own lawyers confident that they can give him their best advice without someday having to hire a lawyer!   The torture, such as it was, was legal.  I repeat, it was legal.  Hence, when President Bush said, "we don't torture," he believed he was telling the truth and that his administration had the law on its side. 
 
On the other hand, President Obama wants to set an example for the world:  That shining city on a hill, albeit one among others equally enlightened.  I'd like to compliment our President, at all events, for keeping an open mind on this important subject.  Bill O'Reilly's opinion has no doubt swayed many, many Americans.  (He agrees with the neocons, the American Machiavellians.)  Fox News's Shepard Smith's opinion, too, has no doubt swayed many of us.  I've listened to both sides till I'm blue in the face.  I ask myself, What would Lincoln do?  Or, What would Gandhi do?  As for what Obama himself would do--he's been influenced by both Lincoln and Gandhi--it's a moot point.  The man has already outlawed the practice of torture.  Or, maybe I should say, he has retrieved certain laws already existing laws.
 
But if a bomb goes off tomorrow in a big city, with threats of more to come, What would we, as a nation, then, do?  I seriously doubt that we would be particularly exceptional.  Within the context of our own laws, precedents and traditions, we would go about the business of defending ourselves.  Whether that flame of American Exceptionalism would continue to burn even under those circumstances remains to be seen.   The same country, I might add,  that gave us Bach, Schelling and Goethe also gave us a Civilization Gone Mad. 
 
This mass insanity happened just a few years before I was born, and it could happen again.  As a world civilization, we've made great progress in science and technology, but we have gone utterly backwards in terms of morals.  Personally, I stand with Barack Obama.  Incidentally, on this point, I agree with Donald Trump, who gave moral support to Obama this evening during an interview.  Way to go, Mr. Trump!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Learning Changes Us

"Learning changes us; it does what all nourishment does which also does not merely 'preserve'--as physiologists know.  But at the bottom of us, really 'deep down,' there is, of course, something unteachable, some granite of spiritual 'fatum,' (fate), of predetermined decision and answer to predetermined selected questions" (Nietzsche, #231 BGE). 
 
Reading on in this controversial text, one finds a footnote, "see Freud."  My take on this is that the first three years of our lives are critical.  Educators and psychologists and pastors have known this, and enlightened politicians (like Ross Perot) have repeated it, publicly.  It is therefore no secret anymore.  Developing capable people means "nourishing" our young people.  The question is, as we receive our billions in government-education handouts and giveaways:  What is the appropriate way to "develop capable people"? 
 
I'd like to compliment the Bush Family, especially, with Barbara Bush on my mind from last night's interview with Gretta:  literacy, universal literacy, is our ongoing noble goal and constant aspiration.  I don't have time to list all the efforts and accomplishments of the Bushes and their in-laws when it comes to Reading, especially. 
 
Those first three years of life, however, when the conditions for aptitude in reading are being determined, are also critical.  I don't know if he is still around, but I'd like to compliment H. Stephen Glenn for his Jimmy Carter-inspired movement of the eighties and beyond, DEVELOPING CAPABLE PEOPLE. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On Cal Thomas and Susan Boyle

I'd like to compliment Cal Thomas for his magnificent piece on the beautiful and talented Susan Boyle. 
 
Indeed, Brit's got all kinds of talent--and beauty.  Only about two weeks ago, I'd never heard of the Great One--I predict--Daniel Hannan.  Here is another extraordinary talent, this one in the arena of politics and literature.  Made fun of by some of his co-workers in government, I think Mr. Hannan has really risen to the occasion.  In fact, he had already done so, and known about it, long before his You Tube presentation brought him to our attention.  Otherwise, he would not have been able to perform as he did on American cable tv.  His performance, just a few "sound bites," really, was brilliant.  All the moreso for the gift of naturalness, the apparent ease with which he pulled it off.  I guess we have to remember that the place where the Beatles started out was Liverpool, England. 
 
But getting back to the spiritually-inclined Mr. Thomas, What was his point about the "pretty woman," Susan Boyle?  I believe it was that we have all been created in the image and likeness of the Higher Power.  Tony Blair, Christopher Hitchens--all of us on the spectrum from belief to unbelief are beneficiaries of the ancient, sacred texts.  Without these great books behind us--divinely inspired or not--our current world-wide orthodoxy of humanism would be the exception and not the rule.  And without this orthodoxy, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights would not exist.  Chances are, we would have little or nothing to aspire to.  As things are now, though, we have a prayer. 
 
I'd also like to compliment the strong moral leadership--itself a thing of beauty--of President Barack Obama.  Standing on the shoulders of giants like Ramakrishna, Vivekenanda, Gandhi, MLK, Nelson Mandella, Alexandr Solzhenitsyn and Jimmy Carter--Barack yesterday preached that we are called to moral greatness not just when it is easy, but when it is hard.  I've not heard such beautiful words in quite a long time. 
 
The great singers, indeed, can make our eyes well with tears. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Larry Sabato's America

Sabato has been a classroom teacher for thirty-two years.  "So I have seen this thing develop over the years," he said tonight on Chris Matthews, talking about the New Majority in American politics (my term, not his).  This new (Democrat-voting) majority has already emerged in the election of Obama and will continue to grow in the next thirty years.  We no longer have "two parties," he said.  "We have one and a half, with the half being the Republicans."  The upshot of the discussion was that the Republicans are going to have to figure out a way to persuade this growing momentum to cease and desist.  Young people, blacks, Hispanics, Asians and "people with graduate degrees" (like me) are extremely turned off by the "culture wars" rhetoric.  Independents (like me) are voting against (like I did) mainstream Republicans.  Why?  Sabato did not say.  He just gave the numbers.  In his "objective" way, however, he seemed to be there as the "other side" to Republican Tony Blankley--who, by the way, was not near as convincing.  But then, I'm not "objective" either!
 
By the way, Dr. Sabato (politcal science, U. of Virginia) has a new book out, "The Obama Years," as I recall the title appearing on the screen.  I, for one, intend to check it out...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On "The Sting, In Four Parts"

First, I want to compliment Charles Krauthammer on an article that is excellent, pure and simple.  However, having gotten my hopes up, I felt a little like the child-growing-up who has just been told in no uncertain terms that Santa Claus does not really exist.
 
Dr. K has succeeded in giving this writer's hopes and dreams a cold shower.  (At least, for this particular comment.) 
 
In AA, we say that "insanity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results."  Thus, the hard-core addict will sometimes say to himself, even after years of recovery, "maybe this time I can handle it."  Such is the human capacity for self-deception....I had to look up the word, "sting," and consult with my wife, the teacher.  Many things came to my mind.  (The singer, Sting; the asp that killed Cleopatra; Muhammed Ali of "float like a butterfly, sting like a bee" wit.)  The dictionary, however, has a rather long set of definitions.  You can guess some of the synonyms or at least adjectives involved:  painful; irritating; poisonous.  But my wife the teacher reminded me that "sting" refers to a police operation for catching the crimimal(s)--an operation involving deliberate, calculating deception.  Krauthammer's article this time requires some interpretation, at least of its title, "The Sting, In Four Parts." 
 
President Obama, it would seem, is in a cold and calculating way attempting to "catch a criminal," the American citizenry.  One aspect of the operation is the "story-line" or "plot."  There is a literary aspect to this attempt to deceive us all.  It has "Four Parts."  Like a long treatise or novel.  The part I remember best is the Non-sequitur.  "It does not follow..."  The logic is all wrong; worse, it is a lie, a deceit and a deception. 
 
The question now becomes, Is Obama's New Foundation a Noble Lie?  In the old classic sense of the term?  Obama has gone way out on a limb.  But so has Charles.  Both actors are "on the record."  In a few months or years, we'll begin to see who was right and who was wrong.  I respect the courage of both players, whom I respect greatly, for daring to make a decision and stick with it.  This very same limelight will be very revealing when the time comes. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Freedom and Obedience

Pope Benedict's recent words in Africa are worth sharing today:  "Yet the word of God is a word of unbounded hope.  'God  loved the world so much that he gave his only Son...so that through him, the world might be saved' (Jn 3:16-17).  God does not give up on us!  He continues to lift our eyes to a future of hope, and he promises us the strength to accomplish it.  As Saint Paul tells us in today's second reading, God created us in Christ Jesus 'to live the good life', a life of good deeds, in accordance with his will ( cf. Eph 2:10).  He gave us his commandments, not as a burden, but as a source of freedom:  the freedom to become men and women of wisdom, teachers of peace and justice, people who believe in others and seek their authentic good.  God created us to live in the light, and to be light for the world around us!  This is what Jesus tells us in today's Gospel:  "The man who lives by the truth comes out into the light, so that it may be plainly seen that what he does is done in God' " (Jn 3:21). 
 
Luanda, Cimangola Square, Eucharistic Celebration with the Bishops of IMBISA.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On Trinidad and Venezuela

President Obama continues to stir the pot with a photo, appropriately on a late Friday afternoon--not that it matters anymore--of his comrade-like handshake with Hugo Chavez.  While I have serious concerns about the Obama's "New Foundation," which he argued beautifully has been built "upon a Rock" (thus comparing it to the Church), and see Charles Krauthammer's scathing article...I'm nonetheless extremely proud of our new brave President and his way of shaking things up a bit.  Lord knows, things need to be shaken up a bit.  (See Paul Tillich's masterpiece, "The Shaking of the Foundations".)
 
This morning I had to get out my magnifying glass--let me confess--to find Trinidad on the globe that sits on our bar.  I wasn't sure exactly where Port of Spain actually is.  Sure enough, it sits right on top of Venezuela, unless my eyes are failing me.  Granada and Guyana are also in the neighborhood.
 
(It's embarrassing to admit just how bad this American's geography can be--but I'm willing to learn.)
 
--And so, What is your Point, Mr. Nowhere Man? 
 
I guess, this Saturday morning, the point is, President Barack Obama means what he says, and says what he means.  He said he wants to bring about some serious change in the way things are done.  From the looks of it, he meant what he said. 
 
In spite of everything--and part of me is very conservative, especially socially--I'd like to compliment our President, Barack Obama.  I'm extremely proud of him and proud to be a citizen and a human being alive at this world-historic time. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Simon Cowell and Edward Cowell

"At forty-two he published his first book, 'Euphranor,' a pseudo-classical colloquy, and resigned himself to placid obscurity.  A few years later he took up the study of Persian with a friend, Edward Cowell, and it was thus that he stumbled over the practically unknown remains of Omar Khayyam" (Louis Untermeyer, editor, The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, trans. Edward Fitzgerald, First Edition,1859:  Random House, 1947).  The Cowells are apparently a very, very distinguished family.  And the apple does not fall far from the tree.  Speaking of which, Roman Catholic Susan Boyle of Idol and You-Tube and Larry King Live...fame...the Boyle Family, too, is one whose praises we might well sing.
 
But tonight we will have to settle for a soprano at the Bass Music Hall in Fort Worth.  If I didn't have to work today, uhg, uhg!, I'd settle down on the Lazy Boy to read Edward Fitzgerald's translation of the Persian Classic, the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam.  As noted above, a Cowell was involved in a roundabout way in bringing this talent to our attention.  As for the performance or event tonight, just What  is it all about? 
 
TRADITION AND THE INDIVIDUAL TALENT. 
 
I love the sounds of those words.  Philosophers have traditionally warned us to be wary of the arts and artists.  But not all artists are utterly decadent.  Many, many are--as they have been for thousands of years.  But we have to give them, with their unique burdens, some leeway, some space.  We also have to have some order in society and politics. 
 
I hope that people are willing to give Mr. Omar Khayyam, the author of the celebrated rhymes, some space.  He deserves it, I would think, even though I've yet to finish reading his masterpiece.  I would also hope and pray that "far away" civilizations would, each scholar in his or her own way, consider the roots of the Traditions.  Scholarship, like music and science, is an international thing, something that rises above the parochial and into the universal sphere.  This point brings me to the Iranian-born composer, Behzad Ranjbaran.  One of his inspirations is the set of rhymes immortalized by Omar, if I may.  And also, in English, by Fitzgerald (with a little help from his friend, Mr. Cowell). 
 
Be all that as it may, I'm wondering, Is Simon Cowell a descendent of the now more immortal Edward Cowell?  I said, immortal, not immoral:  read carefully.  
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On the Ruba'iyat of Omar Khayyam

This, from Tuesday's Dallas Morning News (article by Chris Shull):  "The Fort Worth Symphony Orchestra will perform two pieces by Behzad Ranjbaran in concerts Friday through Sunday at Bass Performance Hall.  "Awakening for Strings" is an intense reflection on war and peace.  "Songs of Eternity" for soprano and orchestra is a philosophical exploration of life, love and death using poetry from the Ruba'iyat of Omar Khayyam."
 
This ancient Persian text, or rather a translation of it, has long been in my library, collecting dust.  (A 1947 edition was bequeathed to me by my grandmother.)  A moment ago, I blew away some of that dust with the intention of leafing through a few pages.  Things Persian are on my mind.  The artist, Behzad Ranjbaran, was born in Tehran.  His work as described by Chris Shull reminds me especially of two other artists, T.S. Eliot and Bright Sheng (born in Shanghai).  What I'm getting at is Eliot's famous essay, "Tradition and the Individual Talent." 
 
In Ranjbaran's case, the Tradition is twofold, the Persian literary tradition and Persian folk music.  The Talent, obviously, is Behzad Ranjbaran.  It would be interesting to see what this Persian-American artist does, at Bass Hall, in the way of retrieving his culture--or should I say in retrieving our culture?
 
From school days I recall T.S. Eliot, especially his prophetic poem, "The Wasteland."  In this case, the "talent" uses his entire poetic-historical being and personality to create a minor classic for the previous century (1914 or so).   The essay, "Tradition and the Individual Talent" interested me for its dialogue with western poetry, yes.  But also for its powerful philosophical structure or dichotomy--on the one hand, tradition--something the conservative in me finds meaningful; and "talent," something the liberal in me aspires to.  Of course, Eliot was really writing, both in the poem and in the essay, about his own experience of his particular life in our particular time--partly that.  And partly something that transcends that "individuality."  Eliot knew a lot, from his doctoral dissertaion, about a certain philosopher who had been heavily, heavily influenced by some heavy-duty German philosophy.  What still interests me about THAT, in a word, is Pure Consciousness.  I mean, "meditation."  We might recall the Sanskrit that Eliot uses in "The Wasteland," "shanti, shanti, shanti."  The poem performs, if you will, a kind of meditation.
 
I'll resist the temptation to even mention, quite pretentiously, Eliot's masterpiece, "The Four Quartets," which apparently has been read for its "negative theology," that is, mysticism. 
 
Finally, the Shanghai-born, Chinese-American artist, Bright Sheng, whose work was performed some months ago in Dallas.  Here I want to praise the virtues of diversity and multi-culturalism, to this extent:  When such talent appropriates its native traditions in an American Context, a Western-symphonic context, magic and mysticism happens.  Moreover, when Sheng the composer walked onto the stage, one felt the power of his personal spirituality.  This alone was worth the price of admission. 
 
"Lyrical and limpid melodies...Shostakovich sense of breath in music phrases, a Bartokian sense of music propulsion, and dramatic and theatrical gestures."  And some of this with...a harp, of all things!  May God bless Bright Sheng and his ongoing retrieval of his Chinese roots in an American (Bernstein, an influence) and Western Tradtion. 
 
And may the Lord of the Psalms bless the glorious work of the Tehran-born Behzad Ranjbaran.  Journalist Chris Shull writes:  "The Fort Worth Symphony Orchestra performed Songs of Eternity once before, at a gala concert in spring 2007 with Renee Fleming as soloist.  The concerts next weekend will be the second this season that feature Ranjbaran's music--selections from his tone poem The Blood of Seyavash were played at Bass Hall in November...As a teenage student-teacher at a conservatory in Tehran, Ranjbaran first explored the integration of Iranian folk music into the Western classical tradition...But Ranjbaran's symphonic music owes as much to the post-romantic works of Strauss and the tone poems of Rimsky-Korsakov as it does to Iranian music.  In Songs of Eternity, Ranjbaran ties ecstatic couplets by the 12th century poet Khayyam into an intensely beautiful exploration on the meaning of life" (The Dallas Morning News, April 14, 2009, 3E). 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On Buchanan, Gay Rights and Natural Law

Tonight on Chris Matthews' Hardball Pat Buchanan took a stand for the Natural Law, that is, the Ten Commandments.  He specifically took issue with the idea, that is gaining momentum, that gays have the right to marry just as men and women do.  He went out of his way to opine that, for example, a gay couple should have certain civil privileges.  If an elderly gay is terminally ill in the hospital, of course his or her lifemate should have access, etc.  But marriage, according to nature, is between a man and a woman who, quite naturally, can procreate. 
 
Now, it's I talking, not Pat.  Five hundred years from now, or a thousand perhaps, things may have evolved to the point where the Church sort of changes its mind about homosexuality.  While I'm at it, the following sins may also be given another look:  euthanasia, abortion, contraception, masturbation, priests getting married.  (If human nature itself were to change, Church teachings might change...a big "if".)
 
But until that day comes when the Church's Magisterium actually changes its mind on these issues, sinners, whether straight or gay, married or single, consecrated or regular folk, should not go to Communion unless they are in perfect accord with Church teaching.  We all of us need to be in the state of grace prior to receiving the Sacrament.  This goes for priests, nuns, laymen, whoever is pope, all consecrated and lay persons including or especially members of special organizations.  For details on any issue whatsoever, see the Catechism.  (Full disclosure:  I myself have not been going to Communion lately; first, I need to go to Confession.)
 
****************************************************************************************************
Today is our Holy Father's 82nd birthday.  Here is a random quotation from a recent homily, this one delivered recently in Africa:  "Today's first reading has a particular resonance for God's people  in Angola.  It is a message of hope addressed to the Chosen People in the land of their Exile, a summons to return to Jerusalem to rebuild the Lord's temple.  Its vivid description of the destruction and ruin caused by war echoes personal experience of so many people in this country amid the terrible ravages of the civil war.  How true it is that war can 'destroy everything of value' (cf. 2Chr 36:19):  families, whole communities, the fruit of men's labour, the hopes which guide and sustain their lives and work!  This experience is all too familiar to Africa as a whole:  the destructive power of civil strife, the descent into a maelstrom of hatred and revenge, the squandering of the efforts of generations of good people.  When God's word--a word meant to build up individuals, communities and the whole human family--is neglected, and when God's law is 'ridiculed, despised, laughed at' (ibid,v.16), the result can only be destruction and injustice:  the abasement of our common humanity and the betrayal of our vocation to be sons and daughters of a merciful Father, brothers and sisters of his beloved Son."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On Barack and Berakha

President Obama's first name, Barack, we are told, means "blessed."  Our Holy Father, fresh from his trip and mission to Africa, seems to have our President at least unconsciously on his mind in a recent homily.  I'm referring to the Holy Thursday, 9 April 2009 sermon.  The reader can decide for himself or herself--if there are any readers.
 
Pope Benedict, an avid student of philosophy almost as much as theology, shares his knowledge and enthusiasm for words.  Words matter.  Without giving a long-winded preface, let me just quote directly from the homily:
 
Please be patient.
 
Here is the quotation:  "As she prays at this central moment, the Church is fully in tune with the event that took place in the Upper Room, when Jesus' action is described in the words, "gratias agens benedixit--he gave you thanks and praise". In this expression, the Roman liturgy has made two words out of the one Hebrew word 'berakha,' which is rendered in the Greek with the two terms 'eucharistia' and 'eulogia.' "
 
Again, fresh from his trip to Africa, the Holy Father may, I repeat, MAY, have our much-beloved, world-historic leader on his mind or in the back of his mind.  The reason I speculate thus is because our pope is intensely in tune with the various possible meanings of words--in terms of suggestions, hints, plays-on-words (following all great poetry).  To put it better, Benedict reads very carefully in the original languages.  He is intimately familiar with Latin, Greek, Italian, French, English, Spanish, German...and possibly Hebrew as well.  Those who know him best say that our Holy Father has a "poetic imagination."  That is, he not only reads carefully in the original language, but brings to that reading a profound sense of metaphor.  Metaphor is all about the extraordinary power of suggestion.  "Love is a rose."  Such talk is a powerful suggestion to our affects, our intellect, our own poetic and historical imaginations.  Not to mention our own will-to-interpret with poetic and even political sensibilities.  Anyhow, let's see what else was on our Holy Father's mind on Holy Thursday, the day on which we commemorate the institution of Holy Communion:  "The Lord gives thanks.  When we thank, we acknowledge that a certain thing is a gift that comes from another.  The Lord gives thanks, and in doing so gives back to God the bread, "fruit of the earth and work of human hands", so as to receive it anew from him."
 
Now comes the good part.  Now comes the connection to the root meaning of Barack's name:  "Thanksgiving becomes blessing."  Again, Barack's name, the root meaning of "Barack," we are told by etymologists, is "blessing."  I don't know.  But isn't this interesting?  One thing I do know:  Our Holy Father is an authentic holy person.  If I'm right about that, the fact has implications for his powers of intellect, intuition, interpretation, poetic and spiritual imagination.  The infusion of the Holy Spirit at that level--truly enlightens a human being.  He or she is operating at a different level.  Just read, for example, The Story of a Soul, by Saint Therese of Lisieux, a spiritual masterpiece written by a bona fide Doctor of the Church when she was dying--in her early twenties!
 
For that matter, read the recent homilies of our Holy Father!  Read the Easter Vigil homily, with its poetry of the "gravitational pull" of love over against the forces of hatred.
 
Where on earth did that metaphor come from?  From quantum physics, which itself derives in part from Newton's classical physics.  In this homily the Bishop of Rome also speaks very deeply of the powers of cosmos, sanctified by the Incarnation, over against the divisions of chaos--an allusion to the Creation Story of Genesis.  The Easter Vigil Liturgy is all about the words of God as we have them in English from the Bible:  LET THERE BE LIGHT.
 
Finally, I want to just round out the passage I'm quoting, at present, from the Holy Thursday homily--and Benedict's homilies always reflect beautifully upon the liturgy of the day.
 
He is meditating upon the Institution of the Eucharist which occurred in the Upper Room at the Last Supper:  "The Lord gives thanks, and in so doing gives back to God the bread, "fruit of the earth and work of human hands", so as to receive it anew from him.  THANKSGIVING BECOMES BLESSING.  (my emphasis.)  The offering that we have placed in God's hands returns from him blessed and transformed.  The Roman liturgy rightly interprets, therefore, our praying at this sacred moment by means of the words:  'through him, we ask you to accept and bless these gifts we offer you in sacrifice'.  All this lies hidden within the word 'eucharistia'." 
 
Now, Christopher Hitchens, if you happen to be reading this, please do not jump to conclusions.  I am not suggesting that Barack is the real Second Coming!  Not that you would care, one way or another!  All I am suggesting--and isn't it interesting?--is that the Hebrew word, 'berakha,' sounds a lot like the word, Barack!
 
President Obama:  You can take it from there.  Our Holy Father may, I repeat, MAY, be suggesting, that, as you go about doing good and searching for a new Christian home, you might do well to consider RCIA,  the acronym used at parishes for the process of learning about becoming a Roman Catholic. 
*******************************************************************************************************
p.s.  I'd like to compliment Governor Bill Richardson for his work in making illegal the death penalty in the great neighboring state, the Land of Enchantment, New Mexico.  I note that the Holy Father allowed this non-pro-life governor...or am I wrong?...to be photographed with him.  Nancy Pelosi apparently was not allowed to be photographed with the Holy Father, even though she must have wanted it badly.  I trust that the Pope will indeed be meeting with Obama and that he will consent to be photographed with a man who is, at best, conflicted about the morality of abortion.  President Obama has said that he wants to create conditions in society in which abortions will become increasingly "rare."  Let us all pray--all who feel sincerely called--let us pray for the making rare of abortion.  More, let us pray for the cleansing of the sin of abortion and all related sins, including all types of illicit sex.  Let us pray especially for the zombie souls who indulge in porn. 
 
Yesterday, President Obama referred to Jesus' Sermon on the Mount.  He then invited the students and staff and the entire "ecumene" to reflect on the parable of the House, one built on sand and the other on Rock.  He thereby argued strongly, and we hope soundly, that his five-point plan for recovery is built "upon the Rock."  He used this expression, "built upon a Rock," repeatedly. 
 
It was almost as if someone had brought to the President's attention the remarkable Holy Thursday sermon of Pope Benedict.  That very same homily in which our Holy Father seemed to suggest that, in our time especially, as we reflect with each other and with the Communion of Saints upon THE TIMES AND THE SEASONS...something is "in the air" vis-a-vis our President Barack Hussein Obama and the inhabited earth that is continuing to learn about the things in the world we have to be grateful for.  Barack and Berakha...The Blessings and the Holy Communion, the UNITY WE ALL SEEK.
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »